Cue-interaction effects in contingency judgments using the streamed-trial procedure.
نویسندگان
چکیده
The authors previously described a procedure that permits rapid, multiple within-participant assessments of the contingency between a cue and an outcome (the "streamed-trial" procedure, Crump, Hannah, Allan, & Hord, 2007). In the present experiments, the authors modified this procedure to investigate cue-interaction effects, replicating conventional findings in both the one- and two-phase blocking paradigms. The authors show that the streamed-trial procedure is not restricted to the geometric forms used as cues and outcomes by Crump et al., and that it can incorporate the conventional allergy stimuli, where food is the cue and an allergic reaction is the outcome. The authors discuss the value of the streamed-trial procedure as a method for advancing our theoretical understanding of cue-interaction effects.
منابع مشابه
The criterion-calibration model of cue interaction in contingency judgments.
Siegel, Allan, Hannah, and Crump (2009) demonstrated that cue interaction effects in human contingency judgments reflect processing that occurs after the acquisition of information. This finding is in conflict with a broad class of theories. We present a new postacquisition model, the criterion-calibration model, that describes cue interaction effects as involving shifts in a report criterion. ...
متن کاملRunning Head : CAUSAL DISCOUNTING Causal discounting in the presence of a stronger cue is due to bias
People use information about the covariation between a putative cause and an outcome to determine if a causal relationship obtains. When there are two candidate causes and one is more strongly related to the effect than the other, the influence of the second is underestimated. This phenomenon is called causal discounting. In two studies, we adapted paradigms for studying causal learning to appl...
متن کاملContingency and opportunism:
Are human contingency judgments based on associationistic principles such as cue competition or on normative principles as specified by rational-cognitive models? In this study, participants learned to predict an outcome from several simultaneously presented cues. They were asked to judge the cues in regard to causal power or statistical concepts such as probability or relative frequency. Unifo...
متن کاملThe psychophysics of contingency assessment.
The authors previously described a procedure that permits rapid, multiple within-participant evaluations of contingency assessment (the "streamed-trial" procedure, M. J. C. Crump, S. D. Hannah, L. G. Allan, & L. K. Hord, 2007). In the present experiments, they used the streamed-trial procedure, combined with the method of constant stimuli and a binary classification response, to assess the psyc...
متن کاملMS# PBR-BR-10-126-R2 Running head: OUTCOME PREDICTION AND CAUSAL JUDGMENT IN PRESS: PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW (Oct. 2010) Contrasting cue-density effects in causal and prediction judgments
Many theories of contingency learning assume (either explicitly or implicitly) that predicting whether an outcome will occur should be easier than making a causal judgment. Previous research suggests that outcome predictions would depart from normative standards less often than causal judgments, which is consistent with the idea that the latter are based on more numerous and complex processes. ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale
دوره 63 2 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009